Publications
Publications from our network
Publications listed below feature authors or team-members from the 2S/LGBTQ+ Health Hub network. This collection features a range of publication types - enjoy your read!
Submit your own
If you'd like to submit a publication to be added to this list, please do so by filling out this form.
A mixed methods investigation of the relationship between blood donor policy, interest in donation, and willingness to donate among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Ontario, Canada
Blood donation policy sits at the centre of this Ontario study, which surveyed 447 gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men recruited from the #iCruise study and interviewed 31 of them. Most participants, 69 percent, were interested in donating, yet an interpretation of the current three-month deferral as discriminatory was common throughout. Two of the four alternative policies tested would meaningfully increase willingness to donate. The authors conclude that an individual risk-based policy applied to all donors, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, would have the greatest impact, paired with relationship-building such as pop-up clinics and staff training.
Learn More"It's a win for the clinic, it's a win for the frontline, but, most importantly, it's a win for the client": Task Shifting HIV Prevention Services from Clinicians to Community Health Workers in Ontario, Canada
Could community health workers take on parts of HIV prevention now handled by clinicians? To find out, researchers interviewed 19 clinicians and 14 community health workers in Ontario in 2020 about shifting HIV and STBBI testing and PrEP services, analysed the transcripts, and checked the findings with a community consultation. Both groups largely agreed that community health workers could deliver rapid HIV testing and that AIDS service organisations would be good places for self-testing kits. Workers were also seen as capable of non-clinical PrEP tasks like pre-counselling and follow-up. The authors recommend training, supervision, and a publicly funded provincial PrEP program.
Learn MoreSetting a research agenda in trans health: An expert assessment of priorities and issues by trans and nonbinary researchers
What should trans health research actually be asking? A group of trans and nonbinary researchers set the agenda themselves, with the first author interviewing every coauthor and circulating drafts until the group reached consensus. They call for long-term research on the risks and benefits of gender-affirming hormones and surgeries, and for a scope well beyond medical transition: routine and general healthcare, life before and without gender affirmation, sexuality, fertility, social determinants, legal gender recognition, and healing within trans communities. Researchers, they argue, must centre trans community expertise, work transparently and accountably. The authors note their group is mostly White and Global North-based.
Learn More'I'm not interested in research; i'm interested in services': How to better health and social services for transgender women living with and affected by HIV
Trans women living with and affected by HIV want better services, not just more studies. A national research priority setting process gathered semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 76 trans women across five Canadian urban centres, exploring how they navigate health and social service programming where they live. Participants offered practical fixes grounded in lived experience: trans-friendly and trans-specific services, integrated care with help navigating overlapping systems, and comprehensive community-based supports. Many suggested hiring trans women as care coordinators or case managers to build affirming environments. The authors also challenge the framing of trans women as a hard-to-reach population.
Learn More"You Could Tell I Said the Wrong Things": Constructions of Sexual Identity Among Older Gay Men in Healthcare Settings
Many older gay men keep their sexual identity to themselves at the doctor's office, expecting the stigma they have met before. To understand that pattern, researchers returned to interview data originally gathered from 27 gay men aged 50 and over about their healthcare experiences, conducting a secondary grounded theory analysis focused on how the men constructed their sexual identity. Findings show that varying exposure to intersecting systems of oppression, combined with how the men read different healthcare settings, shaped those constructions. The work supports policies and practices that tackle stigma and discrimination as real barriers to disclosure.
Learn More