Publications
Publications from our network
Publications listed below feature authors or team-members from the 2S/LGBTQ+ Health Hub network. This collection features a range of publication types - enjoy your read!
Submit your own
If you'd like to submit a publication to be added to this list, please do so by filling out this form.
A conceptualisation of equitable social work practice with transgender and gender diverse communities
Social work scholarship increasingly recognizes transgender and gender diverse people, but evidence on what equitable practice actually involves remains scarce. This Canadian qualitative study interviewed 20 trans and gender diverse social service users and 10 social workers in the same province, using critical ecosystemic and intersectional lenses alongside constructivist grounded theory. Four components of equitable practice emerged: accounting for social and historical context, practising allyship through humility and reflexivity, challenging cisnormativity both interpersonally and organisationally, and promoting structural measures of trans inclusion. The authors urge scholars, educators, and practitioners to adopt reflexive, relational, organisational, and structural changes supporting equity and justice.
Learn MoreToward an inclusive digital health system for sexual and gender minorities in Canada
Most digital health systems record gender and sex as a single binary field, which discourages sexual and gender minority people from seeking preventative screening and gender-affirming care. Over a one-year multi-method project, participants co-created an action plan to modernize how gender, sex and sexual orientation information is handled in Canadian systems. Seven actions are proposed: envisage an equity-oriented health system; engage communities and organizations; establish inclusive terminology; enable systems to collect, use, exchange and reuse standardized data; integrate that data collection within organizations; educate staff to deliver culturally competent care and explain to patients why the data matters; and create a central coordinating hub.
Learn MorePublic health morality, sex, and COVID-19: sexual minority men's HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) decision-making during Ontario's first COVID-19 lockdown
During Ontario's first COVID-19 lockdown, HIV-negative gay, bisexual, and queer men had to weigh pandemic rules against their sexual lives and PrEP routines. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 25 such men and a thematic analysis informed by the sociology of risk, this study traces a public health morality, a contested sense of what counts as responsible sexual citizenship. Shaping it were self-concern versus risk to others, anxiety and economic precarity, pandemic weariness, shaming of non-compliance, and echoes of HIV-era stigma toward queer sex. Men altered practices, stopping, restarting, or stockpiling PrEP, while reviving negotiated safety strategies from HIV prevention.
Learn MoreWho Counts as Trans? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Trans Tumblr Posts
Online spaces let trans communities build knowledge together, and also draw lines around who belongs. This study uses critical discourse analysis of Tumblr posts to examine how trans users define who counts as trans, including how they understand gender dysphoria and its relationship to trans identity. Tumblr has become a popular gathering place for trans youth, and these debates run parallel to shifting medical and mainstream understandings of being transgender. While such platforms can support positive identity formation, the analysis shows communities may reinforce dominant narratives as well as disrupt them, amid an ongoing struggle for visibility, resources, and respect.
Learn More"We're all in an abusive relationship with the health-care system": Collective memories of transgender health care
Collective memory work invites people to recall and analyze their own experiences together, linking personal stories to shared patterns. Six trans participants used this method during a four-hour focus group, examining their health care memories and reaching collective agreements about what those stories meant. The analysis describes a relationship with the health care system that participants characterized as toxic, even abusive. They described asking tentatively for services, unsure whether care would be provided, what its quality would be, or whether they would be treated with respect. Even positive encounters were framed mainly as fears not realized, and all involved some inappropriate conduct.
Learn More